SALT LAKE CITY — As the University of Utah prepares to break ground on new developments across its campus, a key question looms over who will foot the bill for these ambitious projects. The proposed relocation of the Huntsman Center, along with plans to build additional housing, dining, and community spaces, carries a substantial price tag that has divided taxpayers.
Robert Bailey, a Utah resident, expressed a common sentiment, saying, “If the university wants to build a new arena, they should pay for it on their own.” This view echoes a larger public concern about whether taxpayer dollars should be used to fund the university’s construction projects.
However, not all opinions align with Bailey’s. Paul McConkie, another resident, offered a different perspective, stating, “If it’s something that would bring additional revenue to the university, it might be justifiable to use taxpayer dollars.” McConkie’s comment underscores the potential for financial benefits tied to the new facilities, suggesting that if the projects generate long-term income, public funding could be warranted.
Billy Hesterman, a University of Utah alum and current president of the Utah Taxpayers Association, weighed in on the debate by pointing out that universities are already funded by state income and sales taxes. Despite this, he acknowledged that institutions like the University of Utah can often mitigate funding challenges through donations and tuition fees. Hesterman emphasized the importance of financial efficiency when designing such large-scale projects, remarking, “We can have a nice Ford or Chevy, but we maybe don’t need the nicest Cadillac on the market for that building.” His comments highlight the need for balance in creating structures that meet the university’s needs without excessive spending.
University officials have stated that the Huntsman Center would not be eligible for state funding, and the project will likely be funded through a public-private partnership. In addition, the university coordinates with the Division of Facilities Construction and Management (DFCM), ensuring that building designs, project budgets, and progress undergo regular review. This process includes oversight from the Utah State Legislature’s Transportation and Higher Education Subcommittees, who evaluate budgets for any campus buildings receiving taxpayer funding.
As the debate over funding continues, it remains clear that the University of Utah’s expansion plans will shape the future of the campus and raise important questions about the role of public funding in higher education development.